12:50AM
Russia's living in the strategic past

ARTICLE: Russian Weapon Is in Need of Rescue, By MICHAEL SCHWIRTZ, New York Times, July 15, 2009
Sad state of affairs in the Russian military (not so resurgent): a missile that's seen as emblematic of Russia's military recovery suffers a ton of operational issues.
So why the effort?
Still, many Russian military analysts see the emphasis on nuclear modernization here as less strategic than political.
"Every fourth ruble of government military orders goes toward atomic weapons," said Viktor N. Litovkin, deputy editor of the magazine Independent Military Review. "If you have strategic nuclear weapons, then you are a great power; if not, then you are no one."
Indulging such thinking does us no good long term.
Reader Comments (3)
Exactly the same rationale, though, that a great many in the UK use for renewing its nuclear weapons capability
Call me a classical realist in this sense. Is not the human drive for power and its irrational desire for related accoutrements a fundamental aspect of human nature? If so, then all the forward thinking dreams of "progress" can only take us so far.
Russia lives well within this mindset because of their particularly difficult history I suspect having been invaded by Mongols, Napoleon, and Hitler has a way of making a nation be less than sanguine about the threats it perceives.
It may be "outmoded" thinking by our Western standards, but they very fact that it exists in what remains the second greatest nuclear power state means we will remain mired with the unlikely, but never entirely obsolescent prospect of Great Power conflict. This must always be remembered.