Buy Tom's Books
  • Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett, Emily V. Barnett
Search the Site
Powered by Squarespace
Monthly Archives
« Demographics is destiny - for Israel, too | Main | History will judge us on NK »
3:25AM

Robbing DNI to pay State

ARTICLE: Intelligence Chief Is Shifted to Deputy State Dept. Post, By MARK MAZZETTI, New York Times, January 4, 2007

On Negroponte's shift to State: to me this is desperate cannibalizing of talent that should not be moved. What Negroponte has begun in the IC has the potential to revolutionize everything there, and frankly, that should matter more than this administration's current myopic fixation on Iraq. Bush is neglecting the Long War by focusing too much on this one battle, giving us a presidency more trapped by circumstances than other since Nixon.

Our only hope in this shift (which I do not see correcting any significant imbalance in the correlation of bureaucratic forces on the subject of Iraq: so Condi's got Negroponte, Cheney's still Cheney), is that McConnell's past working relationship with Gates positions him well to keep the pile moving at DNI.

Reader Comments (4)

Condy Rice is obviously a nice lady, has degrees, chic boots, inspirational background, fine pianist, a Russia Studies academic, a comfort to her President who needs it, a favorite target of liberal racists—-and clearly out of her depth as Secretary of State. She—and the U.S.— need help, if not a replacement. Will seasoned spy guy---and more seasoned diplomat--- John D. Negroponte deliver? Stay tuned.
January 4, 2007 | Unregistered Commentergringoman
Excellent point! I would rather see Negroponte continue with the IC, especially with the open source intelligence initiative.

Oh well.....
January 4, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterDesiree Fox
The State Department is dysfunctional, profoundly so, and this is not a partisan observation. Nobody's been happy with how it does its job in decades. If the DNI replacement will continue to move the pile in the right direction (and I'll take your word that the replacement will work out well) any assistance in transforming State into something that is remotely functional would be welcome.
January 4, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTM Lutas
"The State Department is dysfunctional, profoundly so, and this is not a partisan observation."

What is disfunctional is an Interagency process in which one agency, DoD, gets 97% of the resources, and then complains that the other agencies don't do their jobs. Negroponte going to DoS won't change that one bit.
January 4, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRKKA

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>