Buy Tom's Books
  • Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett, Emily V. Barnett
Search the Site
Powered by Squarespace
Monthly Archives
« Chinese carmakers: nowhere to go but up | Main | Three makes a pressure group »
10:15PM

Ah, the genius that is authoritarian capitalism!

COMMENT: "Bad loans could take their toll on China's growth," by Michael Pettis, Financial Times, 22 April 2010.

Beijing commited itself to a massive government stimulus, second only to our own. To some, that proves--yet again--the "superiority" of authoritarian capitalism.

To me, it proves the Chinese read Keynes.

Last time China faced a great wave of bad bank loans about a decade ago, it pursued a series of policies, detailed here, that essentially represented a transfer of wealth from unlucky depositors to the state, banks, and businesses. As a result, household income declined to alarming levels.

No question that China's got the bucks to fund any rescues. It's just that the average person will end up paying in the end--again. That means the quest for more domestic consumption will be thwarted.

Despite the current fads in thinking, there ain't no such thing as a free lunch--or a government smarter than markets.

Reader Comments (2)

If I were an average person in China I would be glad that we as a nation had reserves to invest in more infrastructure to keep the source of prosperity going. I would be looking to a better future seeing myself and others like me working saving investing and already moving to form the new better version of a dynamic forwarding looking middle class. Rightly or wrongly I wouldn’t feel the need to put a Western historical context and spin to our economics.

May 2, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterGilbert Garza
I can't see any evidence that China's economy is continuing to open up. Instead I see an increase of state control at the expense of private enterprise. This policy is about preserving CCP power not economic growth. With the US and European export markets now sluggish China seems to be relying on a property bubble for economic growth. In my view the source of Chinese economic growth has been Chinese entrepreneurs and foreign investors, coincident with the reduction of government interference. Current economic prospects don't sound good. On this I agree with Thomas Friedman who said words to the effect "Don't short China but instead short the Chinese Communist Party."
May 2, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterDavid Dunn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>