Buy Tom's Books
  • Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett, Emily V. Barnett
Search the Site
Powered by Squarespace
Monthly Archives
« 'Lesser-included' no more | Main | Bombing Iranian nuke program won't work »
11:04PM

If we want to integrate Afghanistan, we should look to India

ARTICLE: With thumbs-up from Afghans, India explores more areas of aid, By Shubhajit Roy, Indian Express, Jan 05, 2010

The first half:

Buoyed by results of two independent surveys in Afghanistan voting India as the preferred country, ahead of even multilateral agencies like UN and NATO, to carry out reconstruction in the country, India is exploring ways to increase its assistance in various areas to that country.

India, which has a $ 1.3 billion development assistance programme for Afghanistan in place already, may venture into areas of cooperation like agriculture and irrigation apart from existing areas like power, IT, medicine, infrastructure and human resource development.

In a recent Gallup poll, when asked about the roles the Afghans thought that various groups or countries were playing in resolving the situation in Afghanistan, 59 per cent favoured India's role. UN and NATO were mentioned by 57 per cent and 51 per cent Afghans respectively.

In another public opinion survey conducted by the International Republican Institute (IRI), India topped the list of the countries seen as having "good relations with Afghanistan" -- with 24 per cent of respondents naming India, followed by the US (19 per cent), Iran (17 per cent) and Tajikistan (12 per cent). Pakistan, interestingly, was mentioned by only 5 per cent Afghans covered in the IRI survey. In the Gallup poll, about 33 per cent of Afghans surveyed saw Pakistan as supporting the Taliban leadership.

It's interesting, but you never hear anything about India in any American nation-building plan (which is all NATO, NATO, NATO), and yet, by most accounts on the ground, your average Afghan looks to India as the land of opportunity. So if you're going to connect Afghanis to the larger world, why wouldn't any and all cooperation with India on economic development be front and center?

India is the giant force pulling southern Asia into the global economy, not the U.S..

Old story of mine: our natural allies in frontier integration are New Core pillars, not Old Core allies.

Reader Comments (4)

How much of this is just "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" at work?
January 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterTEJ
I'll say it here: Be prepared for a South Asian Union spanning from Afghanistan to Bangladesh. Not because India wants to ruin national sovereignty, but because all of those nations have wannabe Israels and some supra national entity will stich it all together while somewhat maintaining all those fake states.

I frankly do not like the EU that much at all, but the reality is that countries like Ireland don't want it when socio-economics are better...but approve of it when they get bad!
January 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterPetrer
Precisely. NATO has a lot to offer in terms of training and logistics... NATO'll guarantee that everyone is shooting compatible rounds.. but really the US should be working on a strategy of of building it's own String of Pearls among these New Core Pillars (Turkey, India, China... someday hopefully Iran)
January 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAndrew Stewart
Pakistan can not be happy about India's influence. It's probably making them even more paranoid.
January 10, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLarry Y

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>