Buy Tom's Books
  • Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett, Emily V. Barnett
Search the Site
Powered by Squarespace
Monthly Archives
« Why I remain hopeful on Iran | Main | Obama's economic priorities »
3:35AM

NKorea: like Obama's take and a wish

ARTICLE:
N Korea defends nuclear programme
, BBC, 22 June 2009

Rather than fanciful declarations of defending Hawaii (like North Korea could hit it), I like this take from Obama.

And what I'd really like to see is the U.S. shooting down the next missile tested.

Reader Comments (4)

It was interesting that US was moving missile defense systems to Hawaii. In the absence of not knowing what is going on behind the scenes between the US and China, a shootdown would focus everyone's attention more. A bigger attention getter would be Japan drawing a line in the sand in regards to what will trigger their announcement of a Japanese nuclear deterrent.
June 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJeff J
Why shoot down lil' Kim's missile when it can't go very far in the first place? Isn't that simply unnecessary provocation? And even worse, provocation that could be viewed as hostile by China/Russia? You advocated for not having the ABM system in Poland I thought?

Is there still time to offer this jerk-off the 'good, bad and the ugly'? I think it may be too late. And why are the Chinese so afraid of instability, they must understand that Kim's demise is inevitable, and in this economy, the ensuing instability will only be that much stronger in the future.
June 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterThomas Conrad
Sure it would provide a nice sugar-high to shoot down a NK missile. But it doesn't seem like a good strategy in the big picture. Firstly, if we fail to take out the missile, this will encourage even more saber rattling from N. Korea.

And secondly, if we are intent on provoking (which I am not necessarily against) why would we do it on their time-table? We could use blockades / naval inspections, strategic pullbacks from the DMZ, etc etc. And do it on our own schedule rather than being forced to respond to each little N Korean action.
June 23, 2009 | Unregistered Commentercogmeyer
We've invested a lot on ship's with ability to shoot down long range missiles on launch, with the implication that any future missile launch nuke or WMD material would fall back on the launch nation.

Unfortunately, some material would likely drift to South Korea or China, but downing a test missile would make a point.

We should also be ready for N. Korea to launch a lot of short range missiles at the same time as a fireworks highlight, and to make it more difficult to hit the long range one. I would guess we could handle their level of technology and skill.
June 23, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLouis Heberlein

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>