A sense of where Asian unity is

ASIA: "In the shade of the banyan tree: It's time for a column about half the world's people," by Banyan, The Economist, 11 April 2009.
Saying it's both premature and about time for the mag to have an Asian-focused column to go with its US-centric (Lexington) and EU-centric (Charlemagne) ones (Bagehot writes primarily about the UK), The Economist decides it's time to start tracking Asia's progress toward some larger union.
Its current perspective:
In Asia, an insipid collection of regional and sub-regional clubs amounts to something far short of a continental project.
Still, after only introducing an Asia section in the mag in 1987, this move recognizes that there has been a lot of progress since then, meaning this is a trajectory that must be tracked in terms of global structure (26% of global GDP in 1990 and 38% in 2007).
Key to the analysis:
Trade is already promoting economic integration. Two-fifths of Asian exports, and rising, are intra-regional even if half that share forms part of a global supply-chain anchored in the West. But the political process may in the end prove even more profound. The region must see that the simultaneous rise of two continent-sized big powers is peaceful.
The stakes? "Failure would put paid to notions of an Asia century."
Reader Comments (1)