Buy Tom's Books
  • Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett, Emily V. Barnett
Search the Site
Powered by Squarespace
Monthly Archives
« IMF's changing role | Main | China's biggest unfunded man-date »
3:29AM

Bad signs in Pakistan

ARTICLE: Petraeus Calls On Pakistan To Redirect Military Focus, By Ann Scott Tyson, Washington Post, Saturday, April 25, 2009

A sign of how bad it's getting in Pakistan (where their Badlands are as close as West Virginia is to DC): Petraeus delivering in public the sort of message normally delivered in private--even F2F.

Af-Pak quickly becomes Pak-Af.

One can only hope our lines of communication are solid with the Indian Army, because this "crazy" is getting awfully close to India's front lawn.

Reader Comments (3)

Here's a question to debate: Resolved: The US (is|is not) better off with the current Pakistani government (rather than having Musharraf in office.)

I'm left with the sense that from our own interests, Musharraf would have been better at responding to the current crisis. On the other hand, the Pakistani Army trained, etc, under Musharraf doesn't seem to be up to its current tasks (and that's something we cannot blame Zadari for...)
April 27, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDavid Emery
Supporting article from EurasiaNet.org posted on the same day: Washington Has Limited Options In Trying to Halt "Meltdown" in Pakistan.

IMO you may be right that it's shifting from Af-Pak to Pak-Af, but your reasoning may be different. I think that's because Af is already close to stabilized (albeit at the bottom of the barrel), while Pak is still a wildcard and could be rescued with proper intervention at the right place and time. While one (Af) is relatively under control, especially with NATO allies helping throughout the country (which remains part of the lawless badlands with no proper government or governance to speak of), we can say to our friends "hold the fort, we'll be right back" and go take care of more pressing business next door...

And on the issue of India, I would think that we've already made contact there given our focus on the FATA and then the Northwest Frontier Province (including the Swat Valley) which is directly adjacent to that long-standing Indo-Pak argument over the Kashmir...
April 27, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMatthew Garcia
The U.S. Congress was the target of that message, collateral target was the U.S. population. A savvy general probing the power of the public arena.
April 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterHugh

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>