Buy Tom's Books
  • Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett, Emily V. Barnett
Search the Site
Powered by Squarespace
Monthly Archives
« Don't criminalize after the fact | Main | The Beijing Consensus isn't all that great »
3:43AM

If it's part of your country, it's under your control

ARTICLE: Clinton: Pakistani Government 'Abdicating' to Extremist Forces, By Glenn Kessler, Washington Post, April 23, 2009

Tough words from Clinton, but the truth should be told. The FATA are a collection of tribes attached to Pakistan's territory, but it's never really been part of any sovereign nation called Pakistan. The FATA (Federally Administered Tribal Areas) does not come under Pakistan's constitution. Islamabad has agencies "run" the areas much like U.S. agencies once ran Native American reservations in the 19th century (now it's combined under the Bureau for Indian Affairs inside the Interior Department). Much like our current reservations, the FATA are quasi-indepedent, more associated with Pakistan than ruled by it.

You can say Pakistan can't "abdicate" that which it never ran, and you'd be even more right.

Reader Comments (3)

It strikes me that Holbrooke, with his experience in Yugoslavia, really is the ideal guy to deal with Pakistan and Afghanistan. Like Yugoslavia, what is really going on here is the unravelling of two fake states, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Taliban is gaining strength in the Pashtun areas of Pakistan, just as it did in the Pashtun areas of Afghanistan. Seems like we need a Pashtunistan. Should be an independent Baluchistan too. The sooner somebody deals with this openly and directly, the sooner we can get some real countries that can follow India's path to the New Core. Also deals with the nukes that make everybody so nervous. The collapse of the Soviet Union didn't create a nuclear threat. The nukes stay with Punjab and Sindh, just like the Soviet nukes stayed with Russia.
April 24, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterstuart abrams
Look, is that Kim standing on top of that hill?
April 24, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLouis Heberlein
If Kashmir had been taken on head-on , we might not have seen India- Pakistan playing out their squabbles in Afghanistan or Balouchistan , which they both do ( in addition to Kashmir and the opposing home territories).Noboby had the gumption to 'third -party ' the solution because India forbade it and the rest of the world duly followed.So...I don't see any real serious 3rd party effort that would succeed in even approaching the the comparatively greater task of controlling the dismemberment of Pakistan ( without resorting to scary tales of loose nukes which are always overplayed )Pakistan has a growing asset class as the 'Economist' put's it , its ."look at me ..I'm dangerous..Aid me up or I'm going dooown......"( well something like that ).I think we should'nt underestimate Pakistans ability to remain & evolve in some strange suspension between seemingly bizarre & irreconcilable forces that balance each other in some strange way while all the time increasing its value in its strongest asset class all the time.
April 25, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJavaid Akhtar

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>