2:40AM
Survival of the fittest language

POST:
The Ugly American Programmer, By Jeff Atwood, Coding Horror, March 29, 2009
I, for one, believe fervently in the death of minor languages and in a Darwinian struggle for those that remain.
In language, I don't want diversity; I want effective communication.
I will speak whatever the winner speaks, but I suspect English wins. Why? You need only a small vocabulary to proceed. KISS wins, as usual.
And for the Orwellian toss-backs, I need only point out how easily English absorbs foreign influences.
So no, we won't all be reduced to doubleplusgoods.
(Thanks: Neotraditional Librarian)
Reader Comments (2)
Eric Raymond's point about it not being a case of cultural imperialism is entirely valid. It is not a sense of self-righteousness, it's just the way it is. The British conquered most of the world, spreading the English language as they went. Of course the founding of what is presently the world's most culturally dominant nation helped!
In terms of nationalism, perhaps a single "global" language is not desirable, being as languages are key definers of cultural boundaries. But Dr. Barnett's statement "In language, I don't want diversity; I want effective communication" is exactly the point of the article.
Unfortunately, the only way for the internet to function effectively, to its full and astonishing capabilities (which I believe are still far from being fully realized (This final word is an interesting case in point. As an English, as opposed to an American, speaker, I would naturally spell realize with an 's')) is for there to be one sole language in which the vast majority of its content is published. That this language happens to be English is mere happenstance.