10:23PM
No inalienable wage-level right

ARTICLE: In N.C., damage not easily mended, By Peter Whoriskey, Washington Post, November 10, 2009
An exploration of how weakly the U.S. pushes retraining in the aftermath of globalization's deadly competition wiping out local jobs.
I love the guy who used to work for $10/hour and won't consider anything less now. Good thing I'm not so uppity, because I wouldn't have made it through 2009 with that snotty attitude.
(Thanks: Ken Hanson)
Reader Comments (4)
Globalization means that somebody in a country elsewhere is bidding to do your semi skilled job for less than half of what an American worker is going to have to have . . and between technology and globalization, manufacturing jobs are being done away with or moving at an astounding rate . .
When I was teaching College Level Skilled trades, I advised every student, that, in the future your marketable skill(s) had a practicable future of only five to eight years . . after that, your skill was (or would be) obsolete. And along with it, the income level that you had worked up to . . So without study and training in the next skill or vocation, you end up in the same situation the guy who manufactured typewriter keys . . Lots of unneeded skill . .
I wish they would do an extended TV interview to discuss the lessons of that experience.
The pattern is now repeating on Smart Grid and energy transformation stuff. We define and demonstrate it. Folks in China & India, and parts of Europe exploit them. All I see in our media is how new things 'might' have problems.