The logic still holds on terrorism

ARTICLE: "Gates Sees Terrorism Remaining Enemy No. 1: New Defense Strategy Shifts Focus From Conventional Warfare," by Josh White, Washington Post, 31 July 2008, p. A1.
THE CONFLICT IN GEORGIA: "Attack on Georgia Gives Boost to Big U.S. Weapons Programs," by August Cole, Wall Street Journal, 16-17 August 2008, p. A6.
Gates really stepping out there to issue his own National Defense Strategy so late in an administration (somewhat odd). This is the secretary seeking as much lock-in on the evolution unwittingly launched by Rumsfeld (but purposely allowed by him over time) and very wittingly run to ground by Gates.
Gates believes in the "Long War," as do I. He is not much for trading real lives in the here-and-now for fancy hardware for the there-and-imagined wars of the future.
Naturally, that view is opposed by those who promote such big-ticket items. Retired Air Force general Michael Dunn, now president and CEO of the Air Force Association, counters that Gates' criticism of "Next-War-it is" is logically opposed by those who see his push to go long and deep in the Long War (i.e., into the postwar or SysAdmin territory) as "This-War-itis" (actually, a good comeback).
The Big War crowd is ecstatic over Russia and Georgia—especially the missile defense crowd, because—CANYOUBELIEVEIT!—tactical missiles were used!
Obama is more susceptible to being impressed with such arguments, one supposes, than McCain, except McCain is so hell-bent on his League of Democracies (that will be fun to watch in terms of its inglorious death—if attempted; I expect quite a summit, quite an official joint declaration, and a whole lot of nothing to follow) that you gotta believe it will be more of Bush-Rummy's "all my children" approach to defense spending—as in, everybody's happy.
Gates' position is harmed by Russia in the short term, but you know he's right. Any proxy wars we fight we Russia inside the Gap will still focus on the asymmetrical, the COIN, and the postwar rebuilds and stability ops. We will not be fighting Russia straight up conventionally, because that doesn't work between great powers loaded up with lotsa nukes.
And limited great power war is a chimera best left to academic treatises.
Reader Comments (11)
"In the summer of 2006 in southern Lebanon, the Israeli army suffered a significant battlefield defeat at the hands of Hezbollah, who fought with conventional tactics centered on small infantry squads using machine guns, mortars, and antitank missiles."
"Israeli scholar Avi Kober and US Army historian Matt Matthews have shown that the result was at least partly due to Israel's hyperfocus on counterinsurgency."
Can appointees cross over administrations?
Obama could retain him and may try (i'd say it's likely), but i doubt he would stay.
Let's not base our strategy on our actual ops, but rather on those of others.
Brilliant stuff. Hard to argue with.
We all do it. I went to an interfaith/international church session designed to educate the congregation on other folks. That session ended singing Onward Christian Soldiers. The minister gave a Whoops when I noted it to her.
We are engaged in a long term endeavor to help Gap nations, or tribes, transform or evolve toward core characteristics in ways that can improve them while reducing the transformation pain and risks. What should we call that while still motivating ourselves?
I don't know how to coin good catch phrases that inspire in a proper context. What did the Chinese use when they translated Tom's work?
Let's take a deep breath and craft a rational policy that does not turn us into Festung Amerika.
If you haven't seen '12 Angry Men,' highly recommend. You will have plenty of support here.
David,
Unfortunately it sounds like Gates wants no more of life in DC.
Mike,
You're right. Mark Lippert travels everywhere with Obama, gets it.
John,
You're right. Airport security is six year-old soccer: go get ball.
Louis,
Long war is marginally better than gwot.