Want leverage with China on Sudan?

ARTICLE: China Expresses 'Grave Concern' Over Indictment of Sudan's Bashir, By Nora Boustany, Washington Post, July 16, 2008; Page A14

China doesn't really care about Sudan's leader, just about possibly losing out economically on the far side of that event (unlikely to happen unless some enforcing third party steps in and grabs the guy). Address that issue with China and you might get some serious leverage with locals on the subject of this guy's proposed prosecution. In short, there has to be some sort of buy-out package. The only government in Sudan that gives us the guy is a government highly incentivized to do so, and honey tends to outperform vinegar.

Comments

[Robert Tite]

Observing how well the implimentation of the God-Father syndrome is controlling the media and government in America, wouldn't that be effective in ending the brutality in Sudan? (There would be the inital period of blood bathing until after the trasnsition.)

I find it interesting how completely the world media, controlled by 6 major corporations, has shut down thought and descent in america and western Europe. Are there any thinking people left in America? Are they anywhere other than in miltary or government think tanks?That surely is where the money is.

Every one of your readers might find it interesting to view a video about "The Hutchison Effect" on the DrJudyWood.com web site. It explains ONE concept of how the two airplanes on 9-11 made three buildings turn to dust and blow all over lower Manhatten. Where did110 concrete slabs disappear to?

Why a year plus before the Jersey girls were successful in pursuading Cheney to allow a sham commission to white wash what actually happened.

War in Iraq - next in Iran and Venezuala for Oil - Why not go where the oil is - with an army to defeat any one who objects?

We have been lied to big time.