1:56AM
We're number one--with a bullet!

USA TODAY SNAPSHOTS: "Countries with high gun ownership rates," by Anne R. Carey and Alejandro Gonzalez [source is Swiss "2007 Small Arms Survey"], 28 October 2008.
Fear not, gun-owners: Obama can't possibly bring us down enough to lose our number-one global ranking.
Here's the top five: US at 89 small arms per 100 people, Yemen at 55 (a gun-&-knife-toting culture without peer in the uncivilized world, but we still kicks their asses!), Switzerland at 46 (who knew?), Finland at 45 (still expecting the Russians), and Serbia at 38 (just got in the habit, I guess).
When I tell you nobody--and I mean NOBODY--digs and glorifies violence more than Americans, I'm not kidding.
We are the first-person-shooting superpower!
Reader Comments (10)
I had read recently that Finland was 2nd in per-capita gun ownership, so I have to consider the numbers themselves dubious. But, in any review, the U.S. has always been tops.
The U.S. cultural fascination with weaponry is a multi-faceted thing, and reducing it to a 'snapshot' is simplistic and misleading at best. That's neither a promotion nor attack of the 2nd Amendment, just my own observation.
A hundred guys with 20 guns each is a different thing from 2000 people with guns. And really, it doesn't scare me if someone wants to own a couple dozen hunting rifles. Keeping the dangerous stuff off the streets is the real concern.
I've come across a gallup poll that said 38% of households own guns - that seems low. I've also come across polls from "pro-gun" groups that show numbers closer to 60% - but the NRA is hardly an objective source.
Do we have a lot of people with a few guns in their homes, or a few people with a LOT of guns in their homes?
Gun owning households per 100 would be a much more telling statistic.
Militia-type military-political institutions -- e.g. in Switzerland or Finland -- do not necessarily have that many small-arms in private ownership. Non-deocrative or non-sport weapons are typically state-owned and strored in arsenals or kept in lockers of various sorts even at home. They are not for public display or private use.
Also, with real militia, since Roman times, arms and armor are highly standardized and reasonably modern, not cultish or sacramental objects, like turn-of-the-previous-century "1911" pistols or ".44" cartridges, save when incorporated into some official ceremony or monument.
Finally, the concept of "arms" is by no means reduced to just "guns". It includes things like cell-phones and internet protocol (Finland) as well as "mountain bikes" (Switzerland) -- anything "necessary for the security of a free state".
This contrasts with, say, privately-owned farm implements or aristocratic status-goods. Those are characteristic of a feudal (Anglo-Saxon) fryd -- not the same thing as a republican militia at all.
I think the Supreme Court of the United States, pandering to a legacies of the KKK and theories of the NRA, got practical, legal, and historical foundations of the militia upside down and backwards. The militia institution, for instance, has everything to do with suffrage and nothing to do with ownership of property, estates, titles, tithes, and so on.
I guess this might also help explain Switzerland's unbelievably high suicide rate, as well