Regionalizing Afghanistan

ARTICLE: Obama to Explore New Approach in Afghanistan War, By Karen DeYoung, Washington Post, November 11, 2008; Page A01

Good signs from Obama team re: a rethink on Afghanistan. Good to see them not just waiting on word from CENTCOM's strategy review. I hate it when the civilian masters outsource their decision-making function wholly to the military--very anti-American in my mind.

Naturally, I welcome the "regional" approach. It's been the missing link in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Comments

[Ted O'Connor]

Bin Laden is a symbol. A nagging, disturbing symbol. His very existence, regardless of his health or reduced influence, grates at our national pride. In WWII, in less time, we had captured or killed every man responsible for the attack on Pearl Harbor. We should get Bin Laden, we owe it to the people of New York. I don't believe in the "Cutting the head off the snake" theory. In the last 30 years we have captured, or witnessed the death of, every drug cartel boss in this hemisphere. The line of young men ready to take their place stretches from San Diego to Terra Del Fuego. It does not work with the Mafia, it does not work with street gangs. Killing Bin Laden won't stop terrorism but at least a fireman or a policeman can go to the grave of a fallen camrade and say "We got him buddy, we got him".

[Louis Heberlein]

Bin Laden's existence and 'voice' were important in the Information War that overshadows the extreme global terrorism phenomena. The roach trap of Iraq appears to be closing with somewhat satisfied clients. The one in Afghanistan has to deal with broader and deeper cultural and historical roots. Until Iran, Pakistan and perhaps India recognize they can have greater mutual benefits and security from a modern, civilized transformation in Afghanistan no amount of sophisticated US military efforts can produce lasting, conclusive results.