Now here's a reader who's truly pissed off!

Tom got this email:
Subject: Your bankrupt command of the English language
Dear Sir,
Some time ago, I think shortly after it was published, I bought your book "The Pentagon's New Map".
I was enjoying it and respected your ideas until I got to page 174 and was astonished to find you using the crude phrase "pissing off"
I was utterly incensed and disgusted to find, in what I had assumed to be an intelligent book written by a professional, such gutter language. There is a place for such language but not in a book such as this for which I paid good money.
In my whole life of reading hundreds of intelligent books I have never encountered such unprofessional language.
Are you not capable of expressing yourself on a normal level?
Your book should have had a prominent warning "contains offensive language" so that intelligent people could avoid it.
I have completely lost all respect for your ideas and yourself and propose to read no further but throw your book in the trash where it and your ideas belong.
It has taken this long for my disgust to die down sufficiently to allow me to write calmly to you.
Yours in despair,
Neil in California
Tom says:
That is the silliest feedback I have ever received, but thanks anyway.
Another customer served ...
Reader Comments (15)
I think you pissed him off.....
It would appear that Blue Nose Neil might have to little to do. So one could offer him the suggestion that make better use of his time and go scratch his ass.
BTW anyone know what Neil Bush is up to now?
Frankly, I find the once in a while departure to Pattonesque language refreshing and informative if not somewhat unique. It doesnt matter if I agree or not, but as Patton intended when his then language went gutter (today its just main street), we readers get A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING.
But I think the 'gutter language' to which Neil refers is the right label. The use of it in a serious book with significant intellectual content merely undermines and debases your arguments. Such gutter language is also part of the hard-Left coarsening of U.S. society. It is not something which a bright and insightful professional such as you should be subsidizing by your participation.
Even if you were quoting someone, which you weren't, I think you could have conveyed the language without using it. If you can't, then you're not nearly as intelligent as I have heretofore believed. I believe that 'infuriating the Core' would have been a far better and more accurate characterization.
C'mon, man. Get off defense. You're a better man than your cheap-shot response suggests.
Semper Fi--
Warren MillerLexington, Va.
I'd say the resultant number of listeners you have is justification enough to continue using such "blue" phrases as "pissed off".
And if there are those that feel otherwise - well...let them, in oh so elegant and regal terms, explain their position while the rest of us get on with our lives.
Sincerely,
A concerned and Pissed off listener
You chose the "easier wrong" instead of the "harder right." I also do agree with another commenter that "Pattonesque language" has its appropriate uses. But probably not where you used it.
I'm a fan of yours, but your response to someone who disagrees with you disappoints me. I expected better.
You should apologize.
Whether you agree with that or not, I'll still be reading.
I would suppose this is a rather elderly conservative individual, the type of person who equates cussing with offenses like murder and rape, I'm always baffled by that type of morality.