6:28AM
Nukes now come in all sizes

ARTICLE: "Our Atomic Future: It'me to take another look at nuclear power," by William Tucker, Wall Street Journal, 28 March 2007, p. A16.
Great article that makes point few people get as of yet: nukes don't only come in one size--gigantic.
The ones that got and get built tend to fall in the 1,200-1,500 MW range, just like coal-fired electricity plants, but we've had the capacity on nukes to go as low as 5 MW for decades, and with pebble-beds weighing in roughly at 250 MW (ideally, says MIT researchers), then it's clear we have a wide lower range to explore.
And here's the connectivity kicker: these smaller plants are ideal for more remote and off-grid locations. And with pebble-beds, you have the capacity to crack hydrogen and crank potable water as by-products.
Cool wrap-up para:
The only reasonable scenario for avoiding global warming is to substitute nuclear power for coal as our prime source of base-load electricity, supplementing it with wind and solar electricity for our spinning reserve and peaking-power needs. If Al Gore were to support a nuclear-solar alliance--a joint effort by carbon-free technologies to impose a tax on carbon emissions--we could take giant steps toward solving the problem.
Guess who's pushing pebble-beds?
New Core South Africa.
New Core, new rules.
Reader Comments (2)
When the global warming crowd accepts these facts then I will begin to take their arguments about changing the way we live more seriously.
On the other hand, just the other day the Palestinians in Gaza demonstrated that they are not competent to operate something as high tech as a sewage treatment pond.
Pebble bed reactors are certainly far less prone to catastrophic failure than other nuclear technologies and I would like to see nuclear power become a lot larger share of the US energy mix. But there are a lot of places on earth that really should not be operating them at this time.