Interesting Wash Times story on elite unrest in Iran

Here's the start:

Tehran elite turning on extremist presidency

By John R. Bradley

THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Published March 14, 2006



TEHRAN -- Iran's clerical and business establishments, deeply concerned by what they see as reckless spending and needlessly aggressive foreign policies, are increasingly turning against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Within this context, many see the president's long-running confrontation with the United States and Europe over Tehran's nuclear program as an attempt to demonize the West and distract the Iranian public from pressing domestic problems.

A relatively small group of extremists "at the top of the government around the president" are seeking to benefit from a crisis with the West, because "that way they will be able once again to blame the West for all of their problems," said Mousa Ghaninejad, the editor of Iran's best-selling economics daily newspaper, Dunya Al-Eqtisad.

Millions of low-income Iranians voted for the new president last year, motivated by his firm stand against corruption and pledges to give financial priority to their needs.



"His appeal was to those for whom class discrimination is important, and his simple lifestyle gave an air of credibility to his claims," said Nasser Hadian, a political analyst at Tehran University who attended high school with Mr. Ahmadinejad.

Mr. Hadian predicted that senior Iranian clerics would continue to support Mr. Ahmadinejad -- or at least not move against him -- for about a year because of that popular support. But privately, he said, they feel he is isolating Iran internationally and putting its economy at risk.

Also at the back of their minds is the fear that his anti-corruption drive ultimately threatens their own considerable privileges...

Read deeper into the story for the key bits on stock market value dropping and capital flight.

You had to wonder how long it would take for this sort of story to appear.

You also have to wonder how the Bush Administration seeks to take advantage of such divisiveness. Are we just waiting on the Iranians to rise up, with us cheering from afar via "strategic communications"? Hell, the LA Iranians do that better.

Or will we be ready with something better?

Thanks to the reader who sent me this link.