The email sent will contain a link to this article, the article title, and an article excerpt (if available). For security reasons, your IP address will also be included in the sent email.
Barnett's
Beliefs When It Comes To Crafting Grand Strategy
In The Era
of Modern Globalization
as detailed
in
GREAT POWERS:
America
and the World after Bush
- To be plausible,
grand-strategic vision must combine a clear-eyed view of today's reality
with a broad capture of the dominant trends shaping the long-term environment,
meaning no sharp detours--much less U-turns--in history's advance.
- Grand strategy does
not seek to change human nature (which got us to this point quite nicely)
but to placate it, thereby ensuring the portability of its strategic
concepts (the dos and don'ts) among minds from different
backgrounds, cultures, and ages.
- Grand-strategic
thinking always keeps the U.S. government's role in proper perspective,
because globalization comes with rules but not a ruler.
- Grand-strategic
analysis starts with security, which is always 100 percent of your problem
until it's reasonably achieved, because then it's at most 10 percent
of your ultimate solution.
- Grand strategy is
not clairvoyance; it does not seek to predict future events but rather
to contextualize them in a confident, opportunistic worldview.
- Because we live
in a time of pervasive and persistent revolutions, the grand strategist
is neither surprised nor dismayed when the awesome force of globalization's
tectonic shifts elicits vociferous or even violent friction from locals.
- Grand strategy purposefully
aspires to be proactive, not merely protecting itself from failure but
also exploiting avenues of success as they are revealed.
- So grand strategists
do not entertain, much less succumb to, single-point-failure doomsaying,
because systematic thinking about the future means you're not "for"
or "against" issues like peak oil or global warming or resource
scarcity but instead accept the implied dynamics of the change that
has been triggered and factor them in accordingly.
- The grand strategist
is therefore interested more in direction than in degree of change,
recognizing that politics lags dramatically behind economics and that
security lags dramatically behind connectivity.
- Grand strategy
isn't about keeping it a "fair fight"; the grand strategist desires
as many allies as possible and as few enemies as possible, and so he's
interested in everything and anything
that brings adherents to his cause while sapping his enemy's numbers.
From GREAT POWERS, to be published by G. P. Putnam's on February 5, 2009.