The email sent will contain a link to this article, the article title, and an article excerpt (if available). For security reasons, your IP address will also be included in the sent email.
First one (major lead, of course) is about Bush trip to China: Bush, in Beijing, Faces a Partner Now on the Rise.
Then the two better counterarguments:
1) Budding alliances with other New Core members (here Brazil): Brazil Weighs Costs and Benefits of Alliance With China;
and
2) China's economic and diplomatic movement into Africa (the Gap): China Wages Classroom Struggle to Win Friends in Africa.
My point: China is playing a horizontal, asymmetric, nonzero sum game across the entire playing board, seeing all aspects of national power.
Meanwhile, the Bush neocons play a vertical ("We can surround China!"), symmetric ("It's America versus China!"), zero sum ("They rise and therefore we must be falling!") gamae that relies overwhelmingly on military power as the be-all and end-all of influence in the world.
And the world is watching this, and when combined with our sloppy peace-waging effort in Iraq, it signals to them that America is without rudder, without strategic vision, and without a sense of how the world works in the age of globalization.
And we have three more years of this . . .