3:17AM
The anti-Obama hatred is truly weird
Friday, May 1, 2009 at 3:17AM
UNITED STATES: "Obama derangement syndrome: The president is driving some people mad. That may be to his advantage in the short term," Lexington, The Economist, 18 April 2009.
Polls say the man is deeply and widely admired at home and abroad, but there's also a small segment that simply goes nutso over Obama with the fast comparisons to Hitler, Stalin, David Koresh, the anti-Christ, Charles Manson, what have you.
The top-selling book in America is Levin's Liberty and Tyranny (guess which side he comes down on regarding Obama?) and Glenn Beck's bizarre clown act on Fox reigns supreme (claiming we're on the road to fascism).
And so the recent trend of absurd, over-the-top hatred of the president continues in America . . ..
Reader Comments (8)
The difference is that when Bush was president, the lunatics on the Left were not covered by the news media, since the news media basically agreed with them and promoted their views.
Now that there is a Democrat in the White House, the Right wing fringe will receive extensive coverage, and be treated as mainstream, as a way to defame anyone who opposes Mr. Obama.
Opposition to the president will be labeled "hatred", and that "hatred" will be called "racism". The mainstream news media has identified itself with him, and are acting as his allies and boosters. Their goal is to place Mr. Obama beyond legitimate criticism.
This is a structural advantage that Mr. Obama possesses.
Let's see how much good it does him.
Cooks reduce a sause mixture down to create a much stronger flavor. The rush to change is just too fast for comfort and just about every objection is getting labled or reduced down to simplify the argument. Many people seem to need a single issue or simple indisputable fact to hang their hat on - such as "War is bad." Its tough to argue that one unless you have all day, if the listener stays around that long.
I see two differences besides the level, one already mentioned by Lexington, the media’s view. The other is that the GOP doesn’t tolerate some of the more extremes (secret Muslim, not American) and so you hear a lot from that crowd about forming a third party and dumping the Republicans. The Democrats on the other pandered to their weirdo’s for volunteers and money won the Congress and then proceeded to ignore them.
On a similar note though some of the moves by the Obama administration seem almost designed to promote conspiracy theorist and radicals. Some examples- weapons ban talks, census move to the WH, GPS coordinates to front doors during the census, the volunteer act, DHS domestic terrorist report. Add these actions to people that are already suspicious and that spells trouble.
By the way, I'm very afraid of the perspective that, if one does not agree with the President, one is presumed to be racist.