The immoral logic of American food aid
Wednesday, October 12, 2005 at 8:40PM
Thomas P.M. Barnett

"African Food for Africa's Starving Is Roadblocked in Congress," by Celia W. Dugger, New York Times, 12 October 2005, p. A4.


Our laws say the only food aid we can send overseas is stuff grown by our farmers and shipped by our shippers and-apparently-sold often on the side by our relief agencies to self-finance their own anti-poverty programs. Nice huh? CARE and Catholic Relief Services and five other biggies will take food designated for people in Africa and sell it in markets there to raise money for their programs in the region. Talk about starving Peter to finance Paul!


Well, Congress tried to change this stupid law, which basically results in 50% of our food aid disappearing in admin and transportation costs, but the Iron Triangle of food businesses, shippers and relief orgs successfully blocked the legislative change, despite firm White House support. The reform act was supposed to allow U.S. Agency for International Development to buy food locally for starving populations, thus simultaneously improving local agriculture conditions. Sounds pretty sensible given that poor local ag conditions is what gets your starvation in the first place.


But no, better for our companies and relief orgs to get their slice of the pie up front.


Immoral doesn't begin to cover this. This is homicide by negligence and greed.

Article originally appeared on Thomas P.M. Barnett (https://thomaspmbarnett.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.