■"After Arafat, Opportunity? Some Palestinians Hope Moment Brings Reshaping of Governance," by Farnaz Fassihi, Wall Street Journal, 24 November 2004, p. A11.
Hereís a realistic judgment on Arafat: ìHe was the guardian of our national cause but could not understand the modern concept of governance.î So says a long-time legal reform advocate living in the West Bank, where ìPalestinian courts donít repreent or uphold the law, and are procedurally sloppy and filled with corrupt judges.î:
Others pursuing change are focusing their energies on education, health care, police and security measures, and gaining control of Palestinian finances. They accuse Mr. Arafatís tight circle of advisersófor the more part founders of the Fatah movement and exiles who moved here with himóor corruption and cronyism. These failings bear part of the blame, they say, for a shriveled economy and the fact that more than half the Palestinian residents of Gaza and the West Bank live in poverty and nearly half are without jobs.
Those pursuing a new order are hoping to find representatives who will tackle the two main questions facing the Palestinian people: how to have peace with Israel and how to build a new country. ìI think democracy is a precondition to peace. No agreement will be respected if it doesnít come from the people; otherwise we have to oppress our population to reach a deal,î says Mustapha Barghouthi, a member of the National Board of Reform . . .