Receive "The World According to Tom Barnett" Brief
Where I Work
Search the Site
Buy Tom's Books
  • Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    Great Powers: America and the World After Bush
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    Blueprint for Action: A Future Worth Creating
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    Romanian and East German Policies in the Third World: Comparing the Strategies of Ceausescu and Honecker
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 1): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 2): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 3): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 4): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Thomas P.M. Barnett, Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett
  • The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    The Emily Updates (Vol. 5): One Year in the Life of the Girl Who Lived (The Emily Updates (Vols. 1-5))
    by Vonne M. Meussling-Barnett, Thomas P.M. Barnett, Emily V. Barnett
Monthly Archives
Powered by Squarespace
« China's next set of leaders, America's next challenges | Main | Road to stability in Iraq runs through Tehran, not Jerusalem »
Saturday
Dec092006

Nation building on our plate

Incoming Secretary of Defense Robert Gates declares one of his goals will be improving our military's performance in postwar environments. It's tempting to assume any pullback from Iraq signals the end of messy nation-building efforts, but recent history says otherwise, making Gates' commitment vitally important.

During the Cold War, America engaged in nation building once every decade, but since then it's been closer to once every couple of years, especially when you consider the inevitable splintering of fragile states.

This higher frequency in what the Pentagon calls "post-conflict reconstruction and stability operations" corresponds to the sharp rise - since Bush 41, mind you - in the use of American forces in both crisis responses and regime-toppling exercises designed to round up bad guys.

The problem is that bad guys get smarter, shifting their efforts from a "first half" (war) they cannot win against our world-class forces to a "second half" (postwar) where they can prevail against our rather mediocre nation builders. Simply put, insurgents avoid our Leviathan force during war, waiting until the follow-on peace can be sabotaged by terrorism and the battered populace co-opted by their superior forms of tribe building.

It's easy to call it a clash of civilizations and bail, but let me give you several reasons why that is utterly unrealistic.

First, failed states are the essential pawns in this "long war" against radical extremism. The global jihadist movement lives for such opportunities because, despite the holy warriors' vaunted reputation, they can't possibly achieve power anywhere but in the most debilitated regimes.

Second, globalization links our security to these failed states, and this historic phenomenon is picking up speed. Too many Americans live under the delusion that globalization can be stopped with tariffs and a tall border fence, like it'll go away if we just decide we've had enough.

But, guess what? Those 3 billion-plus new capitalists recently added in the East and South want some version of our good life, and they're not simply abandoning the dream because Iraq turns out badly for us. China and India, for example, are all over Africa, linking their economies' booming resource needs to raw material providers.

Trust me, it'll always be somebody's blood for somebody's oil or diamonds or platinum, or ... .

Third, rogue regimes love to meddle in failed states, as Lebanon's recent woes amply demonstrate.

Fourth, defaulting to local dictators as the answer simply delays state failure without curing it. Sure, many strongmen, like Egypt's Hosni Mubarek, aim to replicate the Chinese model of economic reforms prior to political change, but most will fail in that quest simply because China blocks entry into globalization's low-cost tier.

Fifth, waiting on the United Nations to become that second-half peacekeeping kingpin is a dream that died more than a decade ago on the streets of Mogadishu, the capital of Somalia that's now run by a radical Islamist party. Yes, NATO can provide some modest help, but don't expect the "been there, done that" Europeans to resurrect a colonial-era can-do spirit too far beyond their borders.

Sixth, the fundamental nature of war versus peace has been transformed: Wars have gotten shorter, easier to win, cheaper and less labor intensive while the peace has grown dramatically longer, far more complex, a lot more expensive and inescapably labor intensive.

Our real challenge today?

As our overdeveloped war-fighting force gets stronger, it drives up the resource requirements of our underdeveloped peacemaking force. We write checks with airpower that boots on the ground cannot possibly cash.

The good news?

America's Army and Marines are changing this strategic mindset rapidly through improved training, doctrine and tactics. Now, if only our incoming secretary of Defense can shift the budget from smart weapons to smarter soldiers - something Donald Rumsfeld didn't manage - America will move far closer to fielding a second-half force that won't squander first-half leads like the one we once held in Iraq.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>