WSJ: "The Chinese want our nuts." Roast 'em if you got 'em!
Tuesday, April 19, 2011 at 8:13AM
Thomas P.M. Barnett in China, Citation Post, US, agriculture

Sometimes China feels like a nut (2009), sometimes it doesn't (2005).  But when it does and that nut is the pecan, then an entire US industry changes - overnight.

Pecans are very American, the WSJ piece begins, as the pecan is the state nut of Arkansas, Alabama and Texas. Since forever, the price of pecans has followed the usual ag pattern of boom-and-bust. That all changed a few years back when the Chinese and their burgeoning middle class entered the picture.

Why do the Chinese get so turned on to pecans?  Advertising. Retired Chinese woman:  "We used to eat only walnuts, and then we saw on TV that pecans are more nutritious than walnuts." 

And an industry is reshaped.

The underlying dynamic that will increasingly knit the two nations together:

Nearly $1 of every $5 China spent on U.S. items last year went to buy food of some sort, $16.6 billion worth, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. exports of goods of all sorts to China more than doubled between 2005 and 2010. Exports of crops and processed foods—soybeans, dairy, rice, fruit juice—more than tripled. Exports of pecans rose more than 20-fold.

Naturally, fears arose in the industry - or at least among its middlemen.  Check this out:

American shellers complained that selling so many premium pecans to China—the Chinese want the biggest, best nuts—would undermine both the domestic market and export markets in Europe. So they held back orders. China responded by going directly to growers. As Texas A&M pecan expert Jose Pena puts it: "It's kind of hard to tell a grower not to sell to the highest bidder."

There is a larger lesson in there:  US could use a new partner but prefers the seemingly safe "known known" of Europe.  Then China comes along and upsets the dynamics, but still the industry's insiders say, we must stick with what we know.  China goes directly to suppliers, and this is a bit threatening, but who can argue with sales?

Same is true for a lot of what America seeks to do in the Gap/developing world.  We assume our only allies are our old allies.  China shows up and creates all this positive change, but we find it upsetting and have a hard time interacting with them on the subject, preferring our known knowns from Europe. But the path ahead is clear enough:  the market has shifted and we've got some new friends - if we choose to get past the fear and recognize them as such.

This has been my underlying logic going back to "Blueprint for Action" (2005, but started briefing in late 2003). "Implausible!" and even "impossible" in the pol-mil realm, because we prefer the enemy image (AirSea Battle Concept), but the solution for our having too few resources to throw against too many fake states undergoing remapping in the Gap is clear enough: you ally yourself with the great demand producer in the system right now.

Article originally appeared on Thomas P.M. Barnett (https://thomaspmbarnett.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.