WAPO, FT and Economist stories.
As in Iraq, I don't see the Obama administration doing much of anything to regionalize what comes next. This remains completely a US/NATO show, as improved as it may be. And so we are reduced to emphasizing publicly to the world how strong our bond is with the Karzai government--a sure sign that it is weak.
Karzai remains committed to a personality-based rule, because it's what he knows and he knows it's more popular than the Americans. The Americans remain committed to building up institutions, because it's what we know works best, and yet, as in Iraq, there is this sense of having our eye on the door.
And so we are left with our great faith in the Kandahar campaign and the notion that, as one American general put it, the Afghans will "shura their way to success."
I personally would put more faith in a regionalization scheme that engaged the Iranians, Turks, Russians, Indians and Chinese far more explicitly and deeply. Instead, we seem intent on relying on the kindness of the Pakistanis going forward--or maybe it's backward.